🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Multiple Graphs

Band 6+: The charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian cities between 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: The charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian cities between 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image features two line graphs; the top graph titled "Percentage of People Using Public Transportation" spans from 2000 to 2010, with Sydney starting at 15%, Melbourne at 11%, Brisbane at 9%, Perth at 7%, and Adelaide at 7% climbing steadily to Sydney at 23%, Melbourne at 18%, Brisbane 13%, Perth at 11%, and Adelaide at 10% by 2010; the bottom graph titled "Percentage of People Using Private Cars" shows Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth, and Adelaide all starting at 100% in 2000 and decreasing over a decade to Sydney at 78%, Melbourne at 83%, Brisbane at 87%, Perth at 88%, and Adelaide at 90% by 2010, with a slight uptick by Adelaide between 2009 and 2010.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The line graphs compare the distribtution of individuals in five metopolises of Australia by taking public and personal transportation between 2000 and 2010.

It is noticeable that people using general transportation witnessed the predominance and the minority in Sydney and Melbourne, respectively, while the opposite order was completely true for private transportation, with the majority being in Melbourne and the least being in Sydney. Additionally, private transportation increased considerably in usage, whereas its counterpart showed significant shifts.

Regarding public transit, Sydney, standing in the first rank with one-fifth initially, grew substaintially by almost 2%, before decreasing gradually to just under its starting point. This was followed by Perth, which demonstrated a rise from 15% to 18%, then dropping by 3%. Furthermore, both Adelaide and Canberra exhibited an upturn trend, commencing at 12% and 10%, falling to 10% and 9%, and ultimately recovering to their initial figures, respectively. Conversely, whilst there was a moderate lift of approximately 2% in Melbourne in the first 6 years, 4 years later saw a fall of almost 1%, reaching 6% finally.

Conversely, it is evident that Sydney was ranked in the bottom of the list regarding personal transit, which showed a surge of roughly 12% from 11%. Meanwhile, Melbourne dominated throughout, growing gradually from 80% to 90%. Similarly, Perth rised slightly by 5%, equivalent to 40% in 2010, ranking in the fourth position. Ultimately, there was an increase of 20% in Canberra in the observed period, which was two times more than that of Adelaide, reaching 80% and 55%, respectively.

Word Count: 255

Answers On The Same Topic:

The charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian cities between 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graphs compare the usage of public transport and private cars in five cities in Australia over a decade, starting in 2000. Overall, it is evident that private cars were more popular than public transportation across all five cities, with a slight upward trend in their usage during this period. Additionally, while Sydney residents […]

The charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian cities between 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts illustrate how the percentages of public- transport users and private- car users changed in five major Australian cities between 2000 and 2010. Overall, percentages of public- transport users increased considerable in Brisbane in Sydney over a ten-year period. In contrast, level of people using private cars rose in Adelaide and Perth till 2010. […]

The charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian cities between 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts illustrate how the percentages of public- transport users and private- car users changed in five major Australian cities between 2000 and 2010. Overall, percentages of public- transport users increased considerable in Brisbane in Sydney over a ten-year period. In contrast, level of people using private cars rose in Adelaide and Perth till 2010. […]

The charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian cities between 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided first graph illustrates the percentage of individuals’ public transportation usage and the second line graph depicts data on private cars usage in 5 Australian cities: Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Perth and Adelaide, across 2000 to 2010. Overall, the proportion of urban areas people who use public transport experienced slight fluctuations over the given period […]

The charts below show the percentage of people using public transport and that of people using private cars in five Australian cities between 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph compares the percentage of using public transport by people, while other line graph compares of people using own cars in five countries from 2000 to 2010. Overall, the majority of people using in research is Brisbane in 2010. We can also see that Adelaide comprise the largest proportion in other countries in […]

See All

Other Topics:

The charts below show the results of a survey on adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study, while the pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared.

The given charts depict data about adult education. The bar chart compares reasons for adults applying to education programs. The pie chart shows opinions about how the education fees should be divided. It is clear that the most common reasons to start getting education as a grown up are tied with maintaining an interest in […]

The bar chart shows different activities done among people participating in online education in 2024. The line graph shows the participation in online education activities from 2015 and 2024.

The bar graph compares the percentage of individuals involved in five specific types of e-learning in 2024, while the line chart illustrates the number of male and female participants in these activities from 2015 to 2024. Overall, online workshops were the most popular activity in 2024, whereas alternative activities accounted for the smallest proportion. In […]

The first chart shows the percentage of women and men in a country involved in some kinds of ne tasks (cooking, cleaning, pet caring and repairing the house). The second chart shows the amount of time each gender spent on each task per

The first chart demonstrates the percentage of women and men in a country involved doing some home tasks such as cooking, cleaning pet caring and repairing the house. However, the second chart indicates the time each gender spends on each task per day. In general, women involved and spend much time doing cooking, cleaning. Nevertheless, […]

The chart and table provide the allocation of men and women for the household activities, apart from paid work, in 2008 in the UK.

The table and bar chart give information about the allocation of male and female in the UK for household and leisure activities in 2008. Overall, the most popular leisure activities for both genders was watching TV, videos and listening to radio, while women spent more time on domestic responsibilities, especially cooking and washing. In addition, […]

The graph and the pie chart below give information on in-house training courses in a large financial company.

The diagrams depict information regarding a large financial company’s in-house training courses in pie and bar charts. Key information such as training hours per year and office workers’attitude to training are represented as figures. Overall, technical training accounts for the most number of training hours per year when compared to other types. Meanwhile, health history […]

The graph gives information about the number of yearly visits from France and North America for holiday and business. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graphs illustrate the number of holiday and business visits to the UK from France and North America over a twelve-month period. Overall, North America recorded higher figures for both holiday and business visits than France. While holiday visits from North America fluctuated significantly and peaked in July, the number of holiday visitors from France […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.