🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!

Multiple Graphs

Band 6+: The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co - workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co - workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image contains two pie charts comparing relationships with co-workers for the years 2005 and 2009. In 2005, the distribution is: Very good: 63%, Good: 28%, Fair: 7%, Poor: 1%, Don't have co-workers: 1%. In 2009, the distribution is: Very good: 70%, Good: 25%, Fair: 3%, Don't have co-workers: 2%.

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The pie chart gives us information about the relationships between co-workers and with their supervisors in 2005 and 2009.

Regarding relationships with supervisors, the figure for very good increased 61% to 65% from 2005 to 2009, while those with good relationships decreased slightly by 3%. Fewer people said their relationships were fair (between 8% and 6% in 2005 and 2009). Meanwhile, the number of those who did not have relationships grew slightly from 1% to 5%, and 2% of them said there were poor or had no answer.

Most of the employees said their relationships with co-workers were very good, about 63% and 70% in both years. The number of employees with good and fair relationships fell from 28% to 25%, and 7% to 3% in 2005 and 2009 respectively. Only 1% said that it was poor in 2005 but none in 2009, and few of them did not have co-workers.

Overall, most of the employees had very good and good relationships with the supervisors and their peers.

Word Count: 168

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

6.5

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
A2 - Upper Beginner
Consider using more varied and advanced words.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

relationships: 8

their: 4

supervisors: 3

employees: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report adequately addresses the task by summarizing the main features and making relevant comparisons. However, it could benefit from a more precise and focused presentation of the data.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report demonstrates a reasonable level of coherence and cohesion. However, some improvements in the logical flow and paragraph structure would enhance clarity and readability. The grammar errors affect the overall flow.

Lexical Resource

The report uses a range of vocabulary appropriate to the task. More precise and varied vocabulary choices could further enhance the report's sophistication.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

The report demonstrates a satisfactory range of grammatical structures. However, the presence of grammar errors detracts from the overall accuracy and fluency.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts illustrate the results of surveys asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and co-workers in 2005 and 2009. Overall, there are some slight differences between the two periods of time. But there is the same result: all relationships became better after two years. In 2005, the relationships between workers, their supervisors, and […]

Band 5+

The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts illustrate the result of surveys asking workers about their relationships with their supervisor and co-workers in 2005 and 2009. Overall, there are some slightly difference between two period of time. But there is same result that all relationships became better after two years. In 2005, the relationship between workers with supervisor and their […]

Band 4+

The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts illustrate information about workers’ relationships with their supervisors and their co-workers in 2005 and 2009. Overall, the percentage of the very good relationships in both year was the highest. In addition, good relationships also had a high percentages, and other figures only took low percentages. According to the relationships with supervisors, workers […]

Band 5+

The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two pie charts shows the results of surveys done in 2005 and 2009 about how workers felt about their relationship with supervisors and co-workers. Overall, most people were quite happy in both years, but there were some small changes. In general, employees seemed to have a bit better connection with their colleagues than with […]

Band 7+

The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chartS illustrates the results of surveyS between 2005 and 2009 about workers’ relationships with their supervisors and co-workers in six different categories namely: do not have a supervisor, no answer, poor, fair, good and very good. Overall, it can be seen that the percentages of relationships with supervisors and co-workers at work the […]

Band 6+

See All

Band 6+: The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co - workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the results of surveys in 2005 and 2009 asking workers about their relationships with their supervisors and their co – workers. Summarise the information by reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Other Topics:

The charts below show the main sources of funding for wildlife conservation in Africa and South America for the years 2010 and 2020. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate. Write at least 150 words.

The proportion of holiday markers using 4 different types of accommodation in 3 different years

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium