24 Hours Only: Get 20% OFF on Our Premium Plan - Upgrade Now!

Multiple Graphs

Band 4+: The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.

See all user-written answers on this topic

Image for topic: The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.

Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.

The image displays a two-part dataset: (1) Number of train passengers (millions) per year from 2000 to 2009: 35, 37, 35, 38, 40, 39, 42, 41, 45, 47 respectively; (2) Percentage of trains running on time (2000-2009) with target standard line at 95%: 95% (2000), 94% (2001), 93% (2002), 92% (2003), 90% (2004), 95% (2005), 92% (2006), 90% (2007), 94% (2008), 96% (2009).

Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.

Skyrocket your IELTS band score by 1-2 points in under a month with our premium plan!

Check it out

Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The linegraphs demonstrate the amount of train passengers from 2000 to 2009, as well as the percentage of trains running on time.

Overall, the number of passengers over 9 years remained stability at 40 billion passengers per year. However, there were some ups and downs. For example: decreases in 2000 and 2003, on the other hand there was peak such as in 2005. The percentage of trains being on time started with the lowest in 9-year period and which was also recorded in 2005. As a result, neither 2000’s, nor 2005’s decrease affected the final result, which was more than norms.

Starting with the lowest proportion in 2000, approximately 37%, the percentage of train showed, a slight increase, reaching up to 42% in 2002. However,, after 2002,, in 2003,, it renewed the record low, less than 37%. After this lengthy period of ups and downs, it revived and even had a significant peak in 2005, with 48%.

Word Count: 157

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Check My Answer

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Generate A Sample

Overall Band Score

(+/- 0.5)

Vocabulary Complexity:
B1 - Intermediate
Using more sophisticated words could be beneficial.

Grammar Mistakes: N/A

Vocabulary Repetition:

passengers: 3

percentage: 3

Try using synonyms for the above words

Task Response

The report only partially addresses the task, focusing more on the passenger numbers and neglecting a detailed analysis of the on-time train percentage. The data interpretation contains inaccuracies.

Coherence & Cohesion

The report's structure is somewhat unclear, with illogical transitions between paragraphs and ideas. The flow of information is disrupted by grammatical errors and inconsistencies.

Lexical Resource

The vocabulary used is adequate but lacks sophistication and precision in places. There is some repetition and imprecise word choices.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Grammatical errors and inaccuracies significantly impact the overall coherence and understanding of the report. The range of grammatical structures is limited.

Answers On The Same Topic:

The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.

The two illustrations provide the amount of train passengers between 2000 to 2009 and the proportion of trains on schedule. Overall, the number of train travellers remained constant with few lows and highs. While the performance of trains being on time was generally low, the target was met in occasional years, although the trend was […]

Band 6+

The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.

The first chart illustrates the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 units of billion , while the second diagram shows the proportion of trains running on time at the same period . Overall, the number of train passengers was slightly rose at the begging of the period and at the end ,and flacuated […]

Band 5+

The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.

The given line graphs depict the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 and shows the proportion of the train running on time. Overall, the first graph seemed to be unchanged over the time between the starting point with the ending point. In contrast, the second line graph had a significant increase. Firstly, the […]

Band 5+

The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.

The first graph displays how many passengers used train between 2000 and 2009, and the second graph compares the rate of trains running on time with the standard line. Overall , it is clear that the number of people, who utilized trains slightly increased throughout the period. In addition, proportion of the punctual trains was […]

Band 6+

See All

Band 4+: The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.

The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.

The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.

The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009; the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period.

Other Topics:

Combined Charts The table below shows distribution of population in five cities of Pakistan while the pie chart illustrates that of the whole country. Summarize the given information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the reasons of students to study a particular in a UK university in the year 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant

The line graph and the table show the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts below show the main reasons for study among art students of different ages and the level of satisfaction they reported after they began their new course.

Compare the different levels of energy production between 1995 and 2005.

Check Your Answer On This Topic?

Generate A Band-9 Sample Answer?

Overall Band Score

Task Response

Coherence & Cohesion

Lexical Resource

Grammatical Range & Accuracy

Answers On The Same Topic:

Other Topics:

Plans & Pricing

Free

Premium