Nowaday, many individuals believe that animals have the same rights as humans and should not be deprived of their habitat. While the opposite, others think that using animals idd about meeting human need such as food and research analysis. In my view, I feel that the latter view is more beneficial because these amenities are very important for people is life needs.
To begin with, those who support the view animal habitats should not be deteriorated for the sake of human satisfaction. Based on what scientists and philosophers have proven, animals have needs, interests, and also rights such as the right to live freely, or even the right to defend themselves. That can show us that animals themselves also have emotions and have the right to choose to live in the way created by their creator as well as know how to experience emotions and also know pain like humans. For instance, there have been many times when animal rights groups secretly filmed in laboratories showing that animals feel pain just like humans and they suffer when kept in cages for long periods of time.
On the other hand, with the opinion of animal exploitation, he use of animals for human consumption is mandatory for research and food. An important point to note is that these species are included in various studies for academic research purposes, which not only benefits future discovery but also leads to other drugs. each other to treat humans. This can be seen in the way that nearly every medical breakthrough of the past 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals. Animal research also contributes to major advances in understanding and treating conditions such as breast cancer, brain injury, childhood leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, … and many other diseases.
In general, although some people believe that killing animals for research and food is not ethical, I believe that we humans cannot conduct research and receive much nutritional value without using animal.