Education at colleagues must be free for everyone, all people should be educated. Financial background should not be a reason for intelligent people to not be accepted at private universities. From the author point of view, she disagree because we should take into account two fundamental facts, there are public universities for those who can not assist for economical reason to a private colleague; also if someone is intelligent, they may be ingenious too, and they would apply for an scholarship, then there are already two solutions.
Although not everyone can enter to a private university, it does not mean that those are left without education, since there exist public and free universities. Public universities have as an objective allow people who has limited economic resources get educated and learn or study their desire career. In that way people is not getting left without education.
Scholarships were created with the purpose of letting intelligent people acquire the possibility of being in a private colleague for pursue their careers. Then if there are students that want the opportunity of having private education, they can apply this strategy whenever they want, with the condition of being disciplined.
Education actually is free for everyone, even if private education is not, this last one is just a privilege that financial backgrounds can buy. So there are no excuses for people to stay without studying or getting a job title. Moreover it is not unfair people are not admitted at private education if the principal idea is that they are not getting education. The right of getting education still untouchable.