For health care, few things are more crucial than ensuring free medical service for citizens. In many developed and developing countries, a substantial amount of money is allocated to free health care, as it often necessitates the use of various resources, such as hospital, skilled doctor, advance medicine and so on. Nowadays, many would agree that contemporary society has nearly transcended its boundaries and will soon become boundless in its pursuit of free health care for the benefits of the public. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that health care should be free for everyone.
Naturally, free health care in the form of development is considered more essential for government, creating inexhaustible facilities for public healthy life that are not available from other sources. Moreover, it demonstrates unparalleled benefit for citizens, permeating and enhancing every conceivable sector of society. Since people seek healthy life and good medical service through free health care, ample investment in free medical is imperative to elevate modern living standards. If this is adopted by government and individuals alike, many people stand to benefit significantly. Free health service in nations such as China and Japan, for instance, has emerged a pivotal model for medical support, delivering and enhanced services for their people.
Under certain circumstances, individuals may shy away from free medical support due to a range of challenges, such as financial constraints, adverse environmental condition, technological barriers, resource limitation, fear of failure, and lack of support. While free medical service is widely embraced in many major cities worldwide, many people in impoverished and developing nation frequently contend with profound financial limitations and deteriorating conditions when striving to implement this approach. Therefore, the notion of free health care is not always appealing. From economic, social, and national perspectives, if the goals of society dictate that free health care is not merely an option but an imperative, they may choose to embrace it.
However, it is responsibility of government to evaluate the role of free medical service and determine whether it will do more harm than good.