Band 7+: Many countries have the same shops and products. Some consider it a positive development, whereas others consider it negative. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

In recent years identical shops and products have gained popularity among many countries. While some believe it is a positive development since it can enhance convenience and contribute to economic development, others disagree, arguing that it can lead to erosion of cultural identity and economic inequality. In my opinion, both perspectives hold merit and should be considered equally important.

Proponents of this view may say that it can have many beneficial sides for countries. These days tourism is developing day by day and people are travelling to differen parts of the world. Having similar shops and products would create convenience for travelers as they will not have to worry about the quality or cost regardless of the location. Take Walmart as a pertinent example of this. This international supermarket can now be found in many countries, offering similar products and shopping experiences, which results in greater customer satisfaction.

However, opponents argue that it can create many drawbacks to countries. One of the most significant is the erosion of cultural identity. Local markets might find it difficult to compete with large international brands, gradually leading to their disappearance. It does not only result in a loss of cultural heritage and uniqueness but also creates economic inequalities in countries. Since money earned by these international brands flows back into their country of origin, it does not benefit the local economy. Small businesses can be forced out of the market.

In conclusion, the widespread occurrence of identical shops and products may have certain benefits to the public such as providing reliable shopping experiences. However, the benefits of this situation can come at the expense of cultural diversity and small local businesses. From my point of view, it is better to strike a balance between both of them. While allowing international organizations to operate worldwide, governments should make sure it does not have any detrimental effects on countries’ own economy and cultural heritage.