People have different views on the importance of different aid by international organizations. While some people believe that the best way to help developing nations is financial support, others maintain that practical aid and advice are more essential. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument before elaborating on the reason why I am in favor of the latter.
On the one hand, proponents of financial aid argue that it is a more viable approach to bolstering a nation’s development. The influx of funds from international sources can greatly contribute to the achievement of development objectives in developing countries. For instance, financial aid can be instrumental in addressing pressing issues such as illiteracy, poverty, and the aftermath of natural or man-made disasters. A case in point is the substantial loan of around 400 million USD that Japan provided to Vietnam for infrastructural enhancements, transportation improvements, and the construction of public facilities.
Conversely, advocates for practical aid contend that offering sound guidance and support holds greater significance than mere financial injections. Practical advice is deemed essential for building effective strategies and fostering sustainable partnerships, which are imperative for long-term progress and the promotion of self-sufficiency in less developed nations. Unlike financial aid, which can sometimes be misappropriated by corrupt governments, practical aid directly benefits the populace.
In conclusion, it seems evident that both financial aid and practical aid have their own unique advantages, but I maintain that practical assistance is more effective for the success of a country. Therefore, it is advisable to have more practical activities and advice for the improvement of developing countries.