Whether or not animals ought to be used in experiments remains a highly contentious issue. While some claim that these experiments should be restricted due to ethical concerns and the availability of alternative ways, others strongly advocate this experimentation, as they not only contribute to scientific breakthroughs but also ensure public safety. In my opinion, a balanced approach could be far more beneficial and appropriate.
On the one hand, critics argue against animal experiments because of immoral aspects it entails. It is undeniable that laboratory experiments involve dangerous and serious practices, as a result of which people are concerned about animal welfare. Given that animals are sensitive creatures and they can feel pain, they can undergo high levels of distress when being exposed to severe experiments. As a result, conducting such experiments is considered to be inhumane among a certain segment of population. Furthermore, scientists should consider alternative methods. With breakthroughs made in the domain of technology, it has become possible to conduct tests on man-made cells, thus replacing animals. In doing so, scientists can make it possible to conduct tests without animal involvement.
On the other hand, proponents of tests conducted on animals claim that they should be continued in light of their contribution to advancements in medicine. When conducting research by means of animals, scientists are able to come up with new treatments. Were it not for cures and vaccines developed through animal testing, millions, if not billions, of lives would not be saved from serious diseases. Patients now can receive treatment from illnesses that were once incurable. Moreover, once new products are produced, they have to be tested prior to approving it for public use, because of which animals are regarded as the best means to try new goods. When such experiments are conducted, scientists can ensure public safety.
Having said that, from my perspective, striking a balance between both views could be far more advantageous. While experiments still should be conducted in search of breakthroughs in healthcare, strict regulations ought to be integrated. To elaborate, refined testing methods could be improved, thereby reducing the level of suffering that animals encounter during experiments. This approach would enable scientists to continue their research, simultaneously eliminating ethical concerns among people.
In conclusion, even though experiments on animals can give rise to immoral concerns due to inhumane practices, I firmly believe that keeping a balance between both arguments by developing refined testing approaches is more advantageous, which guarantees reduction of ethical concerns and advancements in medicine. 40 min