There is an ongoing debate about whether urban areas will remain livable in the future. Some argue that rising pollution levels and the inevitable growth of urban populations will make cities less habitable. Meanwhile, others believe that technological improvements will prevent such problems. This essay will discuss both perspectives before giving a personal opinion.
It is often argued that pollution and overcrowded contribute the most to the possibility of uninhabitable cities. Nowadays, the majority of people choose to live in metropolitan areas because they provide a more convenient lifestyle and better job opportunities. When the number of people increases, the demand for housing and transportation is more likely to rise. Consequently, cities not only become densely populated but also heavily polluted. According to a recent survey, pollution levels in Jakarta have increased by about 10% each year as a result of reduced green spaces, urban expansion, and greater dependence on multiple transport modes.
On the other hand, others contend that technological innovation can mitigate these challenges by improving urban efficiency and environmental management. Many technology companies have shifted their focus towards developing sustainable technologies. DHL, for example, has adopted biofuels in its logistics operations as a part of its campaign to reduce carbon emissions. From this action, the company has successfully lowered its overall emissions by about 30%. Such advancements demonstrate how technology reduces urban pollution levels, thereby helping cities remain clean and livable in the long term.
In conclusion, while population growth and pollution may threaten the livability of cities, some suggest that breakthrough technologies can sustain and even enhance urban living conditions. In my view, although technology can prevent cities from becoming uninhabitable, people must also be aware of the importance of living sustainably to ensure long-term urban livability.
