The debating surrounding the necessity for individuals to pursue full-time education compulsorily until they reach the age of 18 is giving rise to numerous arguments. Personally, I partly concur with this school of thought, and I will expound on the reasons in this essay.
To begin with, there are many evidences supporting this point of view. Firstly, when people turn out to be 18 years old, it is synonymous with not only being legally responsible for financial income but also satisfying the social norm. By virtue of these issues, the importance of education should be prioritised more than ever. School, where has the ability to provide the knowledge needed for both these objectives, is an ideal place to ensure students’ consciousness and horizons. As a result, the society would be more sustainable and harmonious due to the cultured young generation.
On the other hand, the decision of education path is based on one’s economic background. Instead of the high school program, individuals who are below the poverty level would choose a vocational college to follow. This approach will alleviate the financial burden owing to the affordable tuition and occupational opportunities after school. Therefore, if a country wants to materialize this full-time education plan, the national budget has to be large enough, Germany and Finland could be deemed prime examples.
In conclusion, there is a strong probability that pursuing educational programs until 18 years old could pave the way for future advantages, however, there are complicated problems behind this tendency.