Some people argue that world poverty and famine can only be eradicated if the economy thrives. Conversely, others believe that economic growth should be restricted because it currently harms environmental quality. In this essay, I will examine both perspectives and present my own opinion.
On one hand, economic growth is viewed as the primary means to alleviate poverty and famine for several reasons. Firstly, when the economy is thriving, the standard of living is maximized. This means that services and facilities are improved in accordance with the economic capacity. For example, in China, one of the most affluent countries in Asia, the transportation system is innovatively modern, with extensive high-speed road networks and sufficient amenities to serve its residents, making China one of the most desirable places to live. Secondly, economic growth serves as a blueprint for increasing job opportunities. The more the economy accelerates, the more labor force it requires. A typical example is that many employees from developing countries migrate to developed nations for better job prospects and higher living standards.
On the other hand, I believe that economic growth is a major contributor to pollution. First and foremost, the rise of industrial companies has directly led to deforestation. Due to the need for production space, rainforests and jungles are often targeted. Consequently, deforestation occurs and releases significant amounts of emissions, such as methane and carbon monoxide, which are key factors in damaging the ozone layer. Additionally, many water resources are polluted due to illegal waste disposal associated with industrialization. This is often a result of the high costs of proper waste treatment or a lack of awareness among authorities and business owners, leading them to view littering as a more cost-effective option. Thus, economic growth must be immediately curtailed.
In conclusion, while a thriving economy can significantly reduce poverty and famine, it must be limited to protect the environment.
Word Count: 312