Maintaining the original form of an old building is quite expensive. For that reason, I can’t help but agree with some people’s view that old buildings that have historical value and can still serve their purpose in modern society deserve more preservation than any old building that is simply famous for its outlook.
Although all old buildings scream with prestige due to their impressive and nonpareil architectural design, it is important for governments, especially third-world nations, to prioritize pragmatism.
Developing nations have many programs to focus on that require funding and resources than safeguarding all ancestral buildings, such as combatting poverty, malnutrition, and low literacy rates. Therefore, structures that were built fifty years to centuries ago, such as libraries, houses, hospitals, and commercial buildings that can be reutilized with their intended purpose to contribute to the growth of the economy are worth funding.
Financing the old-aged building that can still serve the needs of the current generation also captures the glamour of the bygone eras, as well as the creative minds of brilliant architects and engineers.
These remnants of the past in the city and rural landscape reflect the culture and the arts of one’s nation. It also reflects the passion of the craftsmen who built these well-established buildings, as these survived disasters and wars. Furthermore, this can be an inspiration to the young bloods who aspire to build buildings that can stand the test of time, as they expose themselves to the rich history of craftsmanship.
On the other hand, all buildings with feeble structures that can no longer be maintained need to be demolished. Everything has its end and must be built anew with a modern structure. However, if the structure holds a historical rite, it can be renovated, but the government needs to seek a sponsor who can help them fund the complete renovation and not only rely on public funds. It should be someone who values more the history of the building than capitalization.
Considering all factors why I concurred that old buildings with historical significance and practical utility in today’s society merit greater preservation than those merely renowned for their appearance. , the preservation of old buildings demands financial resources, hard work, and a deep comprehension of history. Therefore, both the government and its citizens must make informed decisions on which old buildings possess historical significance and practicality in modern society.