Thanks to globalization, there has been a vast expansion of e-books and paper books in the last fifty years. Some argue that e-book is considered to be a fundamental part of the reading process, I, however, agree with those who feel that young learners read up from paper books.
On the one hand, those who support assume that online reading is so convenient, portable that they can read wherever they have a desire. Take an example of electronic books which are utilized with the whole class to share, show and exchange ideas. Besides, some people feel that only e-books are believed to be less time-consuming which assists people to seek information intensively in a short time.
Nevertheless, I side with those who believe that having a library at home is linked to higher academic achievement. It is a fact that paper books are imperative sources that allow people to flick through, absorb more information, and memorize as well. For example, on reading, everybody is permitted to be the best readers prerequisite passing exams. Furthermore, in my opinion, there is no need in charging the books so that the dwellers who live in remote places do not have to search for electricity to read. The people, for instance, would be enabled to learn by the traditional books whether they had no electronic devices. However, perhaps my strongest argument is not to be distracted on account of not having ads similar to e-books. Without a doubt, readers may dive into the data of which they make use, without any hindrance.
In conclusion, although e-books provide information for learners as fast as the speed of lightning, yet, I strongly believe that paper books prevent being distracted, ensures academic knowledge.