A Number of people believe that wealth is for helping others, while others think, it is for their sophistication. I partially agree with the statement, and the reasons are outlined further.
Firstly, an individual can be satisfied if he or she helps others, and according to me it was the only rationale why people exchange help within themselves. The vital thing about being wealthy is that, they can help others financially, though they cannot favour any physical help. For instance, Ratan Tata, proprietor of Tata group of companies donated 66 percentage of his earnings to old age homes and orphanage, although he knows that he can’t get anything as return from them. Moreover, he donates because, he can get a good feel for extending hands to someone who was struggling to uplift themselves. Through his donations and offerings, various non-governmental bodies are functioning in helping others, by which the country maintains its poverty line from getting down further. Hence I feel that helping others is one of the reasons for being rich.
In contrast, funding others more than the limit maybe menace to their existence, as in case of emergency, it is impossible to expect money from them. So, apart from giving others, one should be aware of the financial condition, and should allot some property or cash to be used during an emergency. Also, if they invest the amount in their business or stock market, they can earn more than they have. So, I believe that helping others depends on the situation and mindset of the donor, and one should not force anyone to spend amount in helping others.
In summary, I moderately agree with the statement, as more donations leads to demolishment of themselves, and it this unfair to donate anybody by keeping them at risks. However, one can feel satisfied by donating others. Hence, I suggest that, it depends on the individual, whether to donate or not.