Some people believe that teaching 65-year-old people might be good use of country’s treasury. I strongly disagree with this statement because elder people might have problems with their health and hard to taught them.
On the one hand, elder people already have problems with eyes and computer will make it worse.As people get older, their ability to focus on digital devices declines, which can lead to eye problems and headaches. Furthermore, many seniors struggle to understand modern technology because they did not grow up using computers or smartphones. They usually require much more time and individual support than younger learners, making it hard to teach them.
On the other hand, governments should spend this money to younger generations, who can use these skills for many years. For example, providing students and young adults with free digital training can improve their employment probability and contribute to economic growth. In addition, younger people learn faster and are more likely to apply their knowledge in their future careers, meaning that investment will bring greater long-term benefits.
In conclusion, I believe that spending public money on teaching people over the age of 65 is not the best use of government funds. Instead, governments should prioritise younger generarions, who are more competent of benefiting from such education and helping to society in the future.