Public parks and sports facilities have become increasingly necessary, leading some to argue that such areas should be prioritised over shopping centres. While retail stores undoubtedly offer practical benefits, I largely agree with this view because th ey can enhance national cohesion and promote better public health.
One major advantage of including public parks in urban planning is social connectivity. Public spaces bring residents together, enabling them to communicate with each other while engaging in recreational and leisure activities. Countries such as Japan have demonstrated how public areas cultivate camaraderie among people and enhance community cohesion, which is particularly crucial given the increasing social division globally.
Furthermore, sports facilities play an instrumental role in improving overall public health. As sports fields become more accessible, people are often encouraged to do regular exercise, which mitigates obesity. In several developing countries, a reduction in obesity rates has been correlated with the accessibility to sports fields. In addition, regular exercise alleviates work-related stress, which can be especially valuable for residents who work in highly demanding fields.
Admittedly, if shopping centres were to be included in city planning, they can address traffic jams and reduce exhaust fumes. Some Chinese cities exemplify the abundance of shopping centres that can reduce car travel for shopping. However, by integrating shopping centres with other public facilities in urban planning, governments can ensure comprehensive accessibility for city residents. At the same time, encouraging online shopping practices can lower the reliance on department stores while offering comfort.
In conclusion, while department stores have some practical benefits, the advantages of sports facilities and public parks are far more important. Therefore, urban planners must prioritise including such facilities.