The rapid rate of urbanisation has led to a severe housing shortage in highly developed cities, creating plenty of financial issues. Some individuals argue that it’s the authorities’ responsibility to solve this ongoing problem, while others believe that governments require assistance from citizens to stabilize the problem. Although I agree that the authority plays a crucial role in maintaining the housing challenge, it is also up to the part of individuals to provide the necessary help to reduce the percentage of homelessness.
On the one hand, the government’s actions are essential to slow down the housing shortage. Firstly, solely the government has the authority to implement long-term and effective accommodation strategies, such as lowering rent for low-income households, improving facilities, and creating temporary shelters for the homeless. For example, many huge modern cities like Singapore, Tokyo, and Sydney have successfully managed the housing issue with a thoroughly planned strategy. Without the government’s careful measures, it would be difficult to maintain stability, subsequently leading to serious homelessness and worsening inequality.
On the other hand, it would be a tough challenge for the government to resolve the issue all by itself. Hence, the support from individuals also plays a key role in enhancing the living standard. The private sector, especially the one that specializes in construction, would contribute greatly to tackling the housing problem by upgrading its house model to satisfy the demand for cost and capacity. In addition, individuals can contribute by considering alternative forms of living, such as shared housing or relocating to areas where housing is more available. Therefore, the problem requires the participation of both the government and individuals to optimize the effort.
In conclusion, while government involvement is required to ease the housing problem, collaboration between authorities and private businesses would potentially be more effec
tive.