Nowadays, one of the most discussed topics is government benefits and how it affects the level of poverty and unemployment. Some individuals argue that authority assistance creates dependency and discourage work, while others insist that it’s irreplaceable support to reduce poverty and ensure social equality.
On the one hand, government benefits can discourage individuals from seeking employment and self sufficiency. This type of assistance can be taken for granted without any obligation and individuals abuse unemployment benefits, food stamps or affordable housing. When people receive the financial support without the obligation to work, they become dependent, which decline workforce level . For instance , in the country where allowance is popularised, some residents may delay finding the accommodation, reasoning they can maintain daily necessities without working. As a result, it increases the level of unemployment and reduce the work productivity.
In contrast, others present an idea that government benefit is the crucial role for insuring social equity and reduce poverty. Without these social safety nets, vulnerable groups such as low-income families, elderly generation and disabled individuals would cope with severe consequences of poverty, never have a chance for resilient life. Furthermore, temporary support can provide a foundation for gaining new skills and qualify education for long-term employment in the future. For instance, in low-income families children have a chance for attending vocal training, which opening further perspectives.
In conclusion, every type of assistance needs the balance. Government should both provide necessary aids, temporary financial support and encourage society gaining self sufficiency and stable employment. For instance, developing educational opportunities and vocational training without creating dependency culture.