An influential contemporary trend involves a growing number of individuals expressing their opinions on the subject of creating fixed punishments for each type of crime and considering the circumstances of an individual crime. While it is true that every topic has its advantages and disadvantages, I believe that using fixed punishments for each type of crime has more positive impacts than negative ones.
On the one hand, critics may also point out some drawbacks. They might say that creating fixed punishment can punish people harshly even for small or accidental mistakes. Also, they might highlight the importance of considering the circumstances of an individual crime. It ensures fair decisions. Further, it helps judges understand the situation better.
On the other hand, there are several arguments in favour of my stance. One of the strongest reasons is that it reduces corruption. As an example, judges make decisions based on facts rather than personal influence. Truly, this the most compelling argument, as it leads to various advantages. Moreover, another noteworthy benefit is that creating fixed punishments saves time in court, which further highlights its significance. For example, judges can make quick decisions without long discussions. In addition, it promotes equality among criminals. For instance, both rich and poor criminals receive the same punishment. Also, a recent report by a prestigious university proves the validity of the statement with all the available logical evidence.
In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides of this, the benefits of creating fixed punishments for each type of crime outweigh considering the circumstances of an individual crime. Considering it positive impacts on individuals and society, it is essential to focus on maximising these advantages while addressing any concerns.