In an increasingly globalised world, some people argue that education at university should be free for all pupils. While others believe that it should be chargeable, I firmly suggest that university education should be not be free of charge for all learners to encourage them to enhance their studies.
On the one hand, a certain segment of the society believes that it is crucial for universities to be cost-free to set an equal opportunities for all students. Many poor families will not struggle with financial barriers if post-secondary education is free of charge. For example, learners who are talented will not be wasted due to lack of money. Moreover, this not only ensures pupils with equal knowledge but also promotes social mobility, allowing individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds to achieve upward economic progress. As a result, it helps reduce the gap between rich and poor and leads to a fairer society.
On the other hand, critics of this idea mention that high-level education should be chargeable, mainly because it is a major financial burden on government. Since we live in a modernized era, higher education costs extremely expensive, which means that a huge amount of public money is need to be spend on universities. Furthermore, if students do not pay, they may not take studies seriously. It is obvious that people value what they pay for.
To conclude, although charging for university education has some benefits, I strognly argue that making it free of charge is far more efficient and benificial for pupils from low-income backgrounds.