In modern times climate change is becoming a more critical topic due to its negative consequences. For some schools of thought the process consists of several reasons and one of these is the weak punishment methods of governments against the offenders.
To begin with, despite all laws and protests against the sinners of the climate change, we cannot observe meaningful progress in reducing the damage to the planet. However, for some schools of thought the reason is the governments are not imposing harsh punishments against the sinners of environmental pollution and from my perspective the view point of defenders of this idea have a piece of truth. Notably, making laws harsher in case of breaking environmental standards might be more productive.
Furthermore, as I mentioned earlier, from my perspective laws against the sinners of climate change should be harsher and the number of laws that protect the environment should cover all aspects of the reasons that lead to climate change. Because it is common knowledge that the offenders of climate change, such as great companies, can easily avoid the judgment procedure against them. Additionally, we know that these companies have the highest rates of environmental damage.
In conclusion, my standpoint on this topic is that, considering the view point of the school of thought on this topic also the huge impacts of companies on governments, the legal system against sinners of environmental pollution should be as strong and perfect as possible so the companies can no longer break the law and evade the judicial process.