It is widely believed by numerous individuals that global tourism exerts an adverse influence on the local government. This essay attempts to shed light on the driving factors behind this opposing viewpoint before outlining several imperative solutions that should be adopted to tackle this issue.
There are two primary reasons as to why local residents consider the existence of international visitors might have a detrimental impact on their nation. First and foremost, a number of irresponsible foreign travelers pose serious threats to local historical sites while leaving the consequences on local people. It is worth noting that many prestigious landmarks have been surrounded by trash or devastated with deliberate physical touch by overseas tourists, which forces local governments to allocate further budgets for repair and recovery to those buildings. Secondly, due to insufficient cultural and historical knowledge, overseas visitors might even exaggerate the social problems in their native country. As a prime example, many individuals purchase counterfeit Aboriginal Art in Australia without knowing its originality or noticing the existence of such inauthentic products in the tourism market, which results in the controversial issue that they accidentally support intellectual property violation and even exacerbate cultural appropriation issue within the Indigenous communities.
To combat this worrying concern, the following feasible steps should be taken. The first essential measure is that local authorities could launch a social media campaign acknowledging global citizens in their nation’s issues. For instance, with the help of the internet’s distribution power, the campaign message about some historical sites’ maintenance framework could be spread to a massive number of global citizens, ensuring that visitors could be more cautious and sensible with their actions on mentioned landmarks while paying a visit. The other remedial action could be the authority bodies applying higher entrance fees for overseas travelers in local places. The surplus of visiting fees targeting international visitors contributes to the regional fund for any recovery attempts, meaning that domestic residents are not required to compensate for the adverse outcomes of the outsiders and can even use those budgets to enhance regions’ tourism services and communal gathering activities
In conclusion, there are some underlying motives behind this negative perception towards international tourism, and it is crucial that the aforementioned measures be implemented to change this oppositional perspective.