🔥 Today Only: Save 30% on Premium — Offer Ends Soon! - Upgrade Now!
Multiple Graphs

Band 9: The charts below illustrate the proportions of American students at a university in the United States who were able to speak languages other than English, in 2005 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Image for topic: The charts below illustrate the proportions of American students at a university in the United States who were able to speak languages other than English, in 2005 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Our system will evaluate the answer based on this AI-generated description.
The image shows two pie charts. In 2005: No additional language 45%, Only Spanish 18%, Only French 8%, Only German 5%, Another language 10%, Two additional languages 14%. In 2015: No additional language 30%, Only Spanish 29%, Only French 10%, Only German 5%, Another language 14%, Two additional languages 12%.
Given the complexity of the image, the above description may not be entirely accurate.
Note: Both the topic and the answer were created by one of our users.

The two pie charts compare percentages of American university students in the United States who were proficient in languages other than English over the 10-year-period, specifically in 2005 and 2015.

Overall, it is evident that the percentages of students speaking no additional languages decreased significantly, while Spanish witnessed the biggest increase nearly doubling, and French rose slightly. The figure of only German speakers remained the same at 5%.

In 2005, 45% of students did not speak any additional languages, but the figure decreased to 30% in 2015. Spanish speakers saw the largest growth, rising from 18% to 29%. Meanwhile, the proportion of students who spoke only French increased slightly from 8% to 10%, and those who spoke only German remained stable at 5%. The ‘another language’ category rose from 10% in 2005 to 14% in 2015. In contrast, the percentage of students who spoke two additional languages declined slightly, from 14% to 12% over the period.

Word Count: 156

Answers On The Same Topic:

The charts below illustrate the proportions of American students at a university in the United States who were able to speak languages other than English, in 2005 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two pie charts compare the percentages of American university students in the United States who were proficient in languages other than English over a 10-year period, specifically in 2005 and 2015. Overall, it is evident that the percentages of students speaking no additional languages decreased significantly, while Spanish witnessed the biggest increase, and French […]

The charts below illustrate the proportions of American students at a university in the United States who were able to speak languages other than English, in 2005 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two pie charts compare the percentage of American students in Unated States who able to speak on other languages from 2005 and 2015. Overall, it is easy to notice that the interest of the students in other language is increased significanlty after 10 years. In 2005, the share of residents who were not able […]

The charts below illustrate the proportions of American students at a university in the United States who were able to speak languages other than English, in 2005 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided pie charts represent the shares of students who know foreign languages, and speak in English only at the university of the US in two different time frames: 2005 and 2015. Overall, the fraction of only english users decreased remarkably, whereas the proportion of the pupil with a knowledge of the Spanish language gained […]

The charts below illustrate the proportions of American students at a university in the United States who were able to speak languages other than English, in 2005 and 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts show the proportions of American university students who could speak languages other than English in 2005 and 2015. Overall, by 2015 fewer students spoke only English while the number of Spanish speakers rose noticeably. Other languages showed only small changes over the period. In 2005, 45% of students spoke only English; this […]

See All

Other Topics:

Mixed graphs. Summarize the information by selecting key information and make comparison where relevant.

The pie chart illustrates the proportions of nationalities living in Australia, while the table shows the percentages of people living in urban and rural areas. Overall, native Australians made up by far the largest share of the population, whereas Dutch people accounted for the smallest proportion. It is also evident that individuals from all nationalities […]

The charts show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008-2014. Summarize the information and make comparisons where relevant.

The illustration below describes the amount of volunteers by organizations from 2008 to 2014. Overall, it is clear that environment, art,sport and education had the most volunteers, while the other two showed the less results. In 2008 health Care took only 7% of all the organizations and was the most passive one. At this year […]

Writing task 1 The graph below shows the viewership of different TV programs among three different age groups. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart illustrates various TV programs watched by three different groups, such as those aged 10-15, teenagers, and those aged 21-25, to compare the data. Overall, viewing preferences changed noticeably with age. Younger viewers and teenagers preferred sports and drama, while older viewers watched more news. Film was most popular among teenagers, whereas it […]

Writing task 1 The graph below shows the viewership of different TV programs among three different age groups. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie char illustrates about various TV programs which are watched by three different types groups, such as age 10-15, teenagers and age 21-25 to compares the data. Overall, viewing preferences changed noticeably with age. Younger and teenagers views preferred sport and drama, while older age watched more news. Film most popular among people teenagers, […]

The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel's customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010. Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. Write at least 150 words.

The pi-Chart illustrate the quality of service that provided from Parkway hotel on last 5 years where it cetagorise amoung five cetagorise. In the bigening 2005 from 100 coustomer major 45 percent rated as a Satisfactory level hotel. Among those voting second majority gose to low quality. Where some minor review comes as better but […]

The charts below show the proportion of people’s total spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1998 and 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar graph compares how much money people spent on various goods and services in one country in Europe two years: 1998 and 2008. Overall, spending on three categories saw a decrease, while that on clothing and electronic goods increased, with eating out remaining unaltered. Of these, electronic goods stood out as being the biggest […]

See All
We have detected unusual activity on your device.
Please verify your identity to continue.
Note: This verification step won't sign you in. If you have a premium account, please log in to access the service as usual.
Google/Gmail Verification
Or verify using Email/Code
We've sent a verification code to:
youremail@gmail.com (Not your email?)
Enter it below to complete the verification process.
Ensure your email address is correct, your inbox is not full, and you check your spam folder. If no email arrives, consider using an alternative email.
You will need a Premium plan to perform your action!
Note: If you already have a premium account, please log in to access our services as usual.

Plans & Pricing

Our mission is to make quality education accessible for everyone.
However, to keep our hardworking team running and this service alive, we genuinely need your support!
By opting for a premium plan, not only do you sustain us in achieving the mission, but you also unlock advanced features to enrich your learning experience.

Free

For learners who aren't pressed for time

What's included on Free
100+ Cambridge IELTS Tests
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation (2 times/month)
Instant IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation (5 times/month)
Instant IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator (2 times/month)
500+ Dictation & Shadowing Exercises
100+ Pronunciation Exercises
Flashcards
Other Advanced Tools

Premium

For those serious about advancing their English proficiency, and for IELTS candidates aspiring to boost their band score by 1-2 points (especially in writing & speaking) in just 30 days or less

What's included on Premium
Save Your IELTS Test Progress
Unlock All Courses & IELTS Tests
Unlimited AI Conversations
Unlimited AI Writing Enhancement Exercises
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Evaluation
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Evaluation
Checked Answers Will Not Be Published
Unlimited IELTS Writing Task 1 & 2 Essay Generator
Unlimited IELTS Speaking Part 1, 2, & 3 Sample Generator
Unlimited Usage Of Advanced Tools
Priority Support within 24h (12-month plan only)

Due to the nature of our service and the provided free trials, payments are non-refundable.
Nếu bạn là người Việt Nam và không có hoặc không muốn trả bằng credit/debit cards, bạn có thể thanh toán bằng phương thức chuyển khoản:



Chọn gói:
419,000₫ 277,000 ₫ cho gói 1 tháng (chỉ 9,233₫/ngày)
1,239,000₫ 597,000 ₫ cho gói 3 tháng (chỉ 6,633₫/ngày)
2,469,000₫ 1,027,000 ₫ cho gói 6 tháng (chỉ 5,706₫/ngày)
4,929,000₫ 1,417,000 ₫ cho gói 12 tháng (chỉ 3,936₫/ngày)


Sau khi chuyển khoản, vui lòng đợi trình duyệt tự động điều hướng bạn trở lại Engnovate và bạn sẽ ngay lập tức nhận được mã kích hoạt tài khoản premium.
Nếu có lỗi xảy ra, bạn có thể liên hệ với team thông qua một trong các phương thức: email đến helloengnovate@gmail.com hoặc nhắn tin qua facebook.com/engnovate.
Vì toàn bộ công cụ trên website đều có thể sử dụng thử miễn phí, Engnovate không hỗ trợ hoàn tiền.