The given table illustrates the varied rates of a new theatre in one town by club members and the general public in 2012.
Overall, the theatre was highly-regarded across three surveyed features by both club members and the general public. Notably, information received the lowest rates compared to other categories.
98% of the club members found both the facilities and quality of the theatre either excellent or satisfying, and 2% rated poor. However, quality was higher evaluated with 88% reporting it excellent and 10% satisfied, while the corresponding figures for facilities were 72% and 26%. Similarly, more than 90% of the general public positively rated both features. In contrast to club participants, they preferred the theatre facilities to its quality, with 64% excellent and 24% satisfied reviews, compared to 53% and 40% respectively in quality.
Given lower regards, the theatre information was seen as poor by 14% of the public and 16% of members in the club. While more excellent reviews were recorded by club members than the general public in terms of equipment and quality, the situation was reversed for theatre information, with 66% by the public and 54% by club participants. 20-30% of people in both groups felt satisfied with it.