Many people believe that attending conferences in person is more beneficial than doing in online. I support this idea because numerous distractions can lead to a lack of focus, and individuals may struggle to remember what they have been doing. On the other hand, we can establish rules to help attendees concentrate during offline meetings.
Some individuals argue that meeting via platforms like Zoom or Skype is more effective because it allows for a larger number of participants, even from overseas, without the need for a specific location. They might think, “If we can do this from home, why complicate our lives?” However, I believe that people are more easily distracted by their surroundings. In case, many university students turn off their cameras and open social media during class, only to later complain about their grades. I have seen some of my friends do this and say, “I don’t know what I was learning.” contrast with the only thing they had been doing is avoid the subject.
Another reason to offline meetings is the ability to enforce strict regulations that maintain focus. For example, prohibiting the use of phones during conferences and only allowing pen and paper on the table can be effective. In several universities, some professors have required undergraduates to unplug their mobile devices during class, which has proven effective in maintaining and even increase student concentration.
In conclusion, I believe that in person meetings are more advantageous due to their benefits, such as fostering an environment conducive to focus and, consequently, boosting concentration.