In some regions, health-related services are free of charge, whereas other countries require their citizens to pay for health care themselves. These two systems have both pros and cons, but I believe that the divided payment system is superior to the free one.
Health care free of charge in many countries can have certain benefits. Firstly, it can provide access to free health services in impoverished areas, where people are unable to access health amenities due to financial insufficiency. This can help these poor individuals save their lives when suffering from a disease despite their poverty. Children living in the slums, for instance, can still protect their lives from certain diseases if being given immediate health care without fee. Moreover, when health services are supported financially by the government, access to medical amenities will be spread widely over the country. This means that every person is able to use the system regardless of financial status, which can increase the efficiency of public health care services to some extent.
The divided payment system for health care also offers advantages in certain aspects. A notable advantage can be seen in terms of sufficient funding for medical purposes. When patients purchase their own treatment for some illnesses, the fees can contribute to funding the general health system, which can alleviate financial pressure on the government. This fund can also be utilized to discover new medicine and effective curing methods. Another benefit of this system is for the patients’ preferences. Paying for health services allows patients to choose more suitable and effective treatment options than those offered by the state. Thus, their health conditions can improve significantly due to the suitability of treating methods they pay to choose.
Considering two systems, I suppose that the divided payment system is a better option since the government cannot consistently cover the high costs associated with treating specific diseases. If the state has to bear this burden without the payment of citizens, the public health system is likely to face a financial crisis and become insufficient to the increasing demand for health care.
In conclusion, state-funded health services contribute to widespread healthcare accessibility, particularly in impoverished areas and to some extent, enhance public health. However, I assume that it can still cause a financial crisis if the government’s fund replenishes due to costly fees to cure a large demand and various diseases. Therefore, the system with separated payment is better by giving sufficient funding and allowing patients to pick the best treatment for their health conditions.
