With rapid urban development and modern architectural trends, it has become increasingly common for people to see contemporary buildings dominating city landscapes, particularly in rapidly developing countries. While some argue that modern designs reflect progress and efficiency, I believe that traditional styles should still be used in new buildings to protect a country’s culture and heritage.
Opponents of solitary living cite various reasons to support their stance. From a psychological perspective, when individuals move away from their familiar surroundings to a different living environment, they often lack immediate social interaction and emotional support, which limits their opportunities for spontaneous conversations, shared activities, and mutual encouragement. As a result, they are likely to experience a profound sense of stress and anxiety, thereby increasing the risk of developing chronic mental health conditions such as depression, sleep disturbances, and eating disorders. These challenges can be especially detrimental for people, who are going through difficult times or personal crises. That is why this connection to cultural heritage can foster emotional well-being, particularly among older generations who may feel alienated by overly modern surroundings.
On the other hand, there are obvious benefits to touristic development. As a country promotes its tourist opportunities, a lot of touristic companies and restaurants are built to serve tourists. Besides enabling travellers to enjoy their vacations and holidays, these establishments also provide local residents with a diversity of employment opportunities and a basic source of income. Thus, the growth of this sector can produce personal and social outcomes alike.
In conclusion, although modern architecture symbolizes progress and innovation, I firmly believe that incorporating traditional styles in new buildings is essential. This preservation benefits residents by fostering a sense of belonging and supports the tourism industry by drawing visitors.