In the contemporary era, the rapid advancement of technology has led many to believe that scientists and IT specialists are more highly regarded than those in creative professions like music and art. While I agree that society prioritizes technical expertise in terms of economic rewards, I believe that artists remain equally valuable for the cultural and emotional well-being of humanity.
On the one hand, the high status of scientists and technology experts is undeniable. We live in a digital age where economic growth is driven by innovation, artificial intelligence, and medical research. Consequently, professionals who can solve practical problems – such as developing renewable energy or curing diseases – are often seen as more “useful.” This is reflected in the massive financial investments made by governments and corporations into STEM fields, as well as the significantly higher average salaries compared to the arts. From a pragmatic standpoint, society values those who provide the infrastructure and security for modern life.
On the other hand, the value of musicians and artists cannot be measured by economic output alone. Art and music are the “soul” of society; they provide a means of expression, cultural identity, and mental relief. In times of crisis, people rarely turn to algorithms for comfort; instead, they seek solace in music, films, and literature. Furthermore, the creative industry is a massive global employer that contributes billions to the economy through tourism, media, and design. Without the arts, human life would be functionally efficient but emotionally empty.
In conclusion, while it is true that modern society offers more prestige and financial incentives to scientific and technical roles, this does not mean artists are less important. I believe both fields are essential: science provides the tools for survival, while art provides the meaning for living. A balanced society should value both equally.