It is axiomatic that sport facilities are being invested and built for elite athletes rather than ordinary people. While some think that there are many benefits for countries, like, boosting economy by making them popular and earn respect in the world, I believe this choice raises serious concerns regarding social stigmatization
From an optimistic view, allocating more money on sport infrastructures, like gym, court, swimming pool and others to support sportsmen make an outstanding contribution on broadening the popularity of the country among others. If states spend much money on sport people’s fitness, and training zones, they are likely to advocate them to gain power and truth, which can play a key role to increase belief and faith from country, while parallelly prevent them from demotivation and having depression. As a result, they spend long hours on intensive training rigorous training in sport halls, which are provided by authority to maintain fitness, develop skills, improve endurance and strength, all of which contribute to achieve success, win a medal and championship by set a record.
From a critical perspective, spending money on sports facilities for elite athletes, such as gyms, can pose serious challenges. When a country invests in these facilities for athletes rather than the general public, it may create gaps between sportsmen and ordinary citizens, leading to feelings of neglect and disrespect. As a result, citizens who feel overlooked may lose faith in their country and, in some cases, consider migrating to other European countries where they perceive justice, support, fairness, and respect for people. This, in turn, can encourage others to seek a more equitable environment, ultimately promoting a friendly and harmonious atmosphere in society.
In conclusion, albeit investing money on popular sportsmen brings some benefits, it arises some serious problems, which consequently shows negative effects on countries