It is commonly believed that the general population is responsible for protecting the environment. I disagree with this viewpoint and believe that it is a governmental obligation.
Firstly, the government can contribute more to environmental protection with the effective use of legislative power. Singapore clearly illustrates this point after implementing harsh laws against environmentally harmful activities. For example, littering can result in a fine of up to $10,000, while the dumping of waste can be punished with penalties as high as $50,000. These strict laws have played an indispensable role in changing public attitudes toward the environment, turning this country into one of the cleanest and most eco-friendly nations worldwide. Other countries could adopt similar strategies to achieve such an outcome.
Another factor that favors the environmental duty of the government is its financial capacity. When governing bodies manage to allocate enough money to green policies, such as planting trees, building more botanical parks, and funding programs promoting eco-conscious behavior, they are likely to produce a sustainable environment. Furthermore, they collect taxes, which they reinvest in addressing national problems, such as high poverty or illiteracy rates. This means that a single individual, regardless of their income level, has already contributed, but it is the officials who ultimately decide the investments.
In conclusion, the responsibility of the government extends beyond solving national issues, as it should also ensure environmental sustainability. This is because it has far greater legislative and financial power to implement meaningful ecological reforms. Therefore, I disagree with those who argue that this is primarily an individual duty.