People have differing opinions on whether schools should replace books with movies, TV, video games, and computers for teaching, as many students find books tedious. While I acknowledge the benefits of technology, I disagree that books should be abandoned entirely.
Proponents of tech-based learning argue that teaching through movies, TV, video games, and computers would make studying more effective. Their main justification is that digital media convey information visually and auditorily, helping some students, who are naturally wired to this form of learning, grasp complex ideas more easily than reading through walls of text from books. However, this does not mean schools should abandon books entirely. For one, films and games can be distracting; students may forget to learn and simply treat the content as entertainment. Computers also require supervision. Without it, learners might wander off and ignore the lesson. Thus, while technology offers clear advantages, its potential drawbacks suggest that it should not fully replace traditional methods.
Furthermore, books offer unique benefits that digital media cannot easily replicate. Reading develops concentration and the ability to engage with lengthy, complex arguments without the constant temptation to click away or multitask. A book demands sustained focus, a skill that remains essential for academic study and many professional careers. While a video might summarise a historical event vividly, it rarely encourages the slow, reflective thinking that comes from reading multiple perspectives in a textbook. Therefore, discarding books entirely would deprive students of the chance to build deep reading habits and critical thinking skills that are harder to cultivate through screens alone.
In conclusion, technology offers clear advantages, but its potential drawbacks suggest that schools should not abandon books. Books remain fundamental for building concentration and critical thinking, and discarding them entirely would deprive students of these essential skills.