There is a view that scholars have to remunerate all of their scholarships on their own, meaning higher education institutions get profit from subjects rather than the government. However, I believe that this opinion is misguided, and that the government should cover these expenses.
Higher education benefits not only individuals, but also society as well. The scholars will bring beneficial changes to society because they can bring new innovations. A case in point is Germany, where higher education has been fully covered by society itself since 2014. Given the case, this has led to Germany’s economic growth due to a more skilled workforce. Additionally, this policy has encouraged a vibrant startup culture, particularly in cities like Berlin. This example clearly illustrates that public investment in education generates long-term benefits for society and the economy.
Requiring pupils to pay the full cost of education can exacerbate social inequality. Not everyone has a financial opportunity for studying while covering the expenses all by themselves. This point can lead to a cycle of inequality, restricting opportunities for social mobility. In order to help society, the government should give public funding for education that helps level the playing field, making higher education accessible to all.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the point that students should bear all costs of education. One reason is that a skilled, college-educated workforce benefits society as a whole. Another reason is higher education should be accessible for every pupil regardless of their socioeconomic background, as high tuition costs can be a significant barrier for those from less privileged backgrounds.