The issue of whether governments should prevent diseases by reducing pollution and improving house conditions has sparked controversial debate. While some people are deeply persuaded that it is an impractical solution, I deeply believe that every big change starts with small steps. This way of preventing illnesses is highly effective.
One major argument in favour of reducing environmental pollution is that cleaner air can significantly decrease multiple illnesses. It is widely acknowledged that clean air improves blood circulation, immune system, simultaneously reducing chances of any disorders. For example, a person lives in a polluted city with heavy smog and coughs often, subsequently, becoming sicker and tired. After regular walk in a clean area or movement to cleaner urban environment, it is easier to breathe, sleep, and decrease chances for heart diseases. As a result, clean environment plays an integral part in health’s shaping, and definitely contributes to preventing disease.
Another important perspective is enhancing housing quality, which removes the spread of infectious diseases. Straightly, conditions of housing are equally significant since problems, such as the mould or humidity negatively affects health. For example, it has been scientifically proven that mould negatively affects health, especially to respiratory system. The mould spores are able to cause allergies, asthma m and other respiratory problems. The likelihood of mould spreading is particularly high in damp or poorly ventilated houses. As a result, such minor details might trigger enormous damage to health, even death occasions.
In conclusion, illnesses are extremely dangerous, especially when they stay unnoticed. Therefore, wellbeing care should be always in priority, thus, it is worth to limit problems. Such as