Some individuals are of the opinion that youngsters who commit serious crimes should be punished as adults due to the severity of their crimes. However, I disagree with this opinion.
A reason why some people think that juvenile crimes should not be treated like adult crimes is that juveniles do not fully develop the same level of maturity and judgement as adults. They are still undergoing the process of developing mentally, socially, and emotionally, which can lead to impulsive activities and heightened vulnerability to peer pressure. Simultaneously, if young criminals are treated as adults, it may be unfair and lead to counterproductive outcomes, which does not address the root causes of their behaviour.
However, I believe that young criminals should be punished in the same way as adults. Firstly, this may act as a deterrent to their peers, who might become criminals. In other words, if young people witness their peer criminals tried in court, they can raise awareness of serious consequences and harsh punishments, which discourages them from attempting any criminal activity. For example, when a juvenile criminal who committed armed robbery is sentenced in compliance with legal regulations, other peer individuals can understand the importance of complying with laws and the consequences of illegal activities. Secondly, it can prevent escalating serious crimes in youngsters. If young people who commit minor crimes like shoplifting, illegal parking, or vandalism are ignored and do not take responsibility for these consequences like adults, it may lead to an increasing number of juvenile crimes at an alarming rate and a breakdown of social order.
In conclusion, although juveniles possess a lower level of maturity compared to adults, those who commit serious crimes should face equivalent legal consequences to maintain justice and social stability.