The presence of the extremely rich people in some countries has become a subject of the considerable debates. It is claimed that the country can profit from this situation, but on the other hand, many people demand implementation of the restricting measures in order to control salaries.
To begin with, people with the extremely high income, actually, contribute to development of economy as they pay considerable taxes. Consequently, other citizens also profit, since this money provide many social benefits, for instance, affordable education or reliable transport system. Furthermore, wealthy individuals have a feasibility to arrange the charity organisations as well as fund in different useful projects.
On the other hand, it is very common when the big players substitute small business that leads to monopoly, significantly higher prices, and decreasing avarage salary. A lack of limitations on the reachness sometimes results in expanding shift between elite and poverty. If money were distributed more equally among the population in the country, people would have the same opportunities, what is significantly more fair. All people deserve the life full of new experiences insted of suffering from hunger or terrible conditions. Personally, I tend to the second point of view, in spite of all advantagies for economy that could appear due to extremly wealthy people.
In conclusion, it is more likely to deal with poverty and facilitate the prosperity of nation if the measures, delimishing the unproposional bigger salary, will be implemented. Otherwise, the society could be separated into two groups, one of which will control and another only obey.