It is true that new residential buildings are now being constructed in urban green zones due to population growth. While this development can help to address housing shortages, I believe that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits.
On the one hand, there are two main advantages of improving housing infrastructure in cities. One significant benefit is that building new apartments can provide affordable housing for low-income families. As a result, urban residents can live in comfortable and well-equipped homes, which improves their quality of life. Furthermore, construction companies can offer a range of job opportunities for engineers, architects, builders, and designers. For example, in my country, companies in major cities recruit workers from rural areas, which helps to reduce unemployment and enables people to earn a stable income to meet their basic needs.
However, despite these advantages, constructing houses in natural areas can also lead to several serious problems. Firstly, it has a harmful impact on the environment, as trees are cut down to make space for new buildings, turning green spaces into concrete jungles. This, in turn, contributes to environmental issues such as air pollution and rising temperatures due to reduced vegetation. Secondly, the reduction of natural spaces may contribute to health problems such as breathing difficulties, allergies, and respiratory illnesses, which can lower the overall quality of life. Finally, rapid construction in green zones can place significant pressure on urban infrastructure, resulting in traffic congestion and overcrowded public services, making daily life more stressful.
In conclusion, although improving housing infrastructure is a good way to respond to citizens’ needs for shelter, I would argue that it does more harm than good.