Rising university tuition fees and limited job opportunities for graduates have led some people to argue that universities should stop teaching arts subjects such as philosophy and history and focus only on practical courses that improve employment prospects. I strongly disagree with this view because arts subjects play an essential role in both individual development and the long-term progress of society.
Firstly, although practical and technical courses offer short-term employment, arts subjects play an integral role in personal and professional development. Through learning history and philosophy, individuals develop moral, ethical, and social values. Moreover, these subjects encourage analytical thinking, effective communication, and decision-making, which are required in many professions. Employers often seek graduates who can solve complex problems, think independently, and adapt to changing situations rather than those with only narrow technical knowledge. For instance, many policymakers, successful leaders, thinkers, and lawyers are from humanities backgrounds, showing that these degrees can also lead to meaningful careers.
Secondly, universities are not just job seeking centers, these institutions provide valuable cultural and traditional preserves along with permanent historical records. These high ranked universities enable the youth to secure the high paying jobs and live a healthy lifestyle. Without arts subjects, education would become narrow and purely technical, producing graduates who lack a broader understanding of the world.
In conclusion, despite teaching highly practical and technical courses, I strongly disagree with the perspective that universities should not teach arts subjects. I think, a balanced approach with clear directions and proper planning of teaching arts and sciences subjects is mandatory for the next generations.