In contemporary society, there is a significant ongoing debate regarding whether e-books hold more value or printed ones. This discussion has garnered widespread attention due to its implications on human learning and development. It is often argued by some people that electronic versions are crucial in terms of accessibility, while others contend that paper books are more beneficial as they encourage focussed learning. This essay will examine both the perspectives before arguing that electronic books are more feasible option.
On the one hand, the supporters of e-learning claim that they are readily accessible. As everyone possesses electric devices nowadays, books are available for everyone on mobile phones without the hassle of travelling to markets. Moreover, it has reduced the challenges to carry heavy books. Instead people download them in phones and read whenever and where-ever they want to. To illustrate, a survey conducted in 2021 in Newfoundland, Canada, revealed that 83% people were more comfortable reading online, highlighting the profound inclination of general population towards e-books.
Conversely, the proponents of conventional books argue that they foster concentration and attention. Since there are no distractions around unlike electric devices, there will be negligible chances to lose focus. For example, Adam Dblin, a famous Journalist attributed his high retention capability to paper-based reading. This scenario clearly emphasizes the impact of conventional books.
However, in my opinion, e-books are more effective tool as they are not only easily accessible but also cost effective. They help avoid the problems of shortage as well as travelling expenses.
In conclusion, although traditional books are considered to be effective in knowledge retention, I believe that online books are more convenient and easy to carry.