The question of whether countries should produce their own films is currently the subject of much debate. One might argue that the majority of the world’s cinematographic production is already accounted for by Hollywood, and therefore there is no need for countries to invest in film production at home. However, there are several reasons why foreign films and programmes can be beneficial. They provide an opportunity for people to learn more about the world, and they can also help to maintain a country’s film industry, as domestic films are preferable for a substantial part of society.
There are several reasons in favour of importing foreign films. The principal benefit is that it offers viewers the chance to enhance their knowledge of a foreign language in an enjoyable and engaging manner. This assertion is contingent upon the films being broadcast with subtitles, as opposed to being dubbed. For instance, the highest level of English proficiency among non-native speakers has been documented in the Netherlands and in the Scandinavian countries. These are the countries in which films are consistently exhibited in their original language. This is undoubtedly attributable to the high level of English proficiency among the citizens of these countries. Furthermore, viewers may also derive considerable benefit in terms of acquiring knowledge about new cultures. For many, the financial resources required for overseas travel are not available. However, the viewing of foreign films provides an accessible alternative to international travel. One may gain insight into a multitude of aspects, including customs, traditions, preconceptions, and the general way of life in other countries. Finally, access to foreign films is particularly beneficial for countries whose film industry is underdeveloped. In Russia, for example, the quality of films is generally low due to a lack of talented directors and actors. Watching a Netflix film after a typical Russian drama is a welcome change of pace. Not only is the acting more impressive, the aesthetic appeal is also greater.
Conversely, films of domestic production offer certain advantages. First and foremost, for a significant proportion of the population, domestic films are more readily comprehensible than foreign films. Such individuals are more readily able to relate to films produced in their own countries. The same is true for the elderly, who sometimes feel opposed to foreign cultures and tend to choose cinematography of their own country. Furthermore, one can gain significant insight into the history of their own country from domestic films. For instance, in Russian cinematography there are numerous films on the country’s historic events of different periods. Despite the potential for bias and an opinionated point of view, these films offer valuable educational opportunities, prompting further exploration of the subject matter.
In conclusion, it can be argued that the right to choose what film to watch should be afforded to all. Furthermore, it would seem prudent for countries to import foreign films, while also maintaining their own film production.