Most stories dominating today’s headlines are centered around wars, crimes, accidents, and famines. In my opinion, the underlying cause is that a majority of the audience finds such news stories entertaining. I strongly advocate that there should be a balance between both positive and negative news publications.
To commence, the primary reason behind this issue is the substantial volume of readers who find these news stories entertaining. Human minds tend to be pessimistic, and there is a fascination with observing the chaos and suffering of others. Consequently, numerous broadcasters and printing presses prioritize the publication of such news to boost their ratings or viewership. For example, YouTube videos featuring news reporters discussing negative events garner high views, while videos depicting community events such as tree plantations or water body clean-ups struggle to attract viewers. Therefore, it is the audience itself that craves such content, compelling reporters to publish them to enhance their revenues.
Moving further, I vehemently believe that there should be a balance between the types of news disseminated to the public. Positive news serves as motivation, showcasing the presence of numerous individuals globally who strive for the betterment of humanity. These news stories prompt certain individuals to step outside their homes and participate in local events that contribute to the community’s well-being. Furthermore, negative news offers insights into irrational events, providing opportunities for learning how to address such situations in the future for the welfare of society.
In conclusion, it can be asserted that humans are wired in a way that they find negative news entertaining, leading most media outlets to prioritize such stories to boost ratings, viewership, and ultimately their income. Additionally, negative news aids individuals in learning from mistakes, while positive news encourages people to undertake tasks for the betterment of society.