The number of flights has increased in recent years
or to interrupt flying completely. I think the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.
Reducing the number of flights would lead to a drop in pollution and carbon footprint. In fact, the fewer the number of flights, the less pollution, for example, air and noise pollution. Furthermore, such a policy can cause commercial advantage. To be exact, reducing the number of trips can lead to a decrease in the price of tickets.
Some, on the other hand, believe that such an issue would lead to business problems. For example, the tourist industry is of great significance. Infact, when the number of tourists decreases, it would lead to serious damage to the economy. If travellers cut back on flying, profits for airlines, hotels, and local services may decline. However, there are many transportations systems like train, bus and ferry. For instance, traveling by train would be the most efficient and eco-friendly plane alternative. Moreover, they are many scientists, students and researchers that travel by aircraft, if people decrease the number of flights, they will not implement their research but they can use the internet and classes.
In conclusion, restricting air travel would not have any effect on the environment, and the disadvantages outweigh the advantages in the case of travelling and economic growth.