Some people believe primary cause of wars is nationalism, while others argue that fewer ethical politicians is the major problem starting wars. This essay will discuss both perspectives and present my opinion.
View patriotism as the primary cause of wars that it frequently leads to nationalism, where countries prioritize own interests over global cooperation. For instance, between countries which extreme nationalism and patriotism in countries such as Japan and Germany contributed to aggressive expansion and military conflicts, which were world War II. Citizens supported their government’s actions, believing they were defending national pride and superiority, which subsequently had been a global war. In the nick of time during World War, many countries were up a creek without a paddle, while in this way a major decision was on a nationalism.
One the one hand, conversely others argue that patriotism can help a country and protect against war between countries. Exemplify, political leader such as Mahatma Gandhi use nonviolent resistance to lead India from British rule. His politics prevented violent uprising and wars, as he inspired millions to fight with difficulties. Additionally , demonstrating that ethical political strategies could lead to independence without bloodshed. Mahatma Gandi frequently did everything for the country, likewise he was equitable person for their demos.
In conclusion, while problem is primary cause of wars, it can serve to prevent less ethical politicians from running a country or starting wars. Nonetheless, I believe with opinion which nationalism can lead to establish better politics and, it can be efficient approach.