Keeping Animals in zoos is a controversial part in this modern world. Few believes that animals should be kept in zoo, because they think beast are harmful for mankind, while some argues that keeping them in cage is a crime, because every life has rights to live with freedom. This essay will cover both views.
On the one hand, people reckon these monster don’t have the authority to wander freely because they can harm people anytime and they have the potentials to do beyond anyone can think such as killing others, doing destructions. According to New York time’s,”13 people lost their lives by Lion attack in South Africa and 7 individuals were killed by vipers in Sahara.” So some thinks they should be killed or stay in cage.
On the flip side, A lot of people believes that animals should live freely because keeping them in zoo is a dangerous crime and it may affect our environment. It is also opposite to every religion and the Hindus worship many animals such as Tiger, Cow, Snake, and so on . The Muslims believe Allah created them and only Allah can take lives; some time he does this with animals. A study shows that 35% of people want them to be killed.
In conclusion, the ethical considerations of not housing animals in zoos is an evident that they are not always harmful . They can live with freedom . while The challenges are also relevant because they are beast and they doesn’t have the sense, they may take anyone’s lives.
In conclusion, while the ethical considerations of housing animals in zoos remain contentious, it is evident that, when managed appropriately and scientifically, zoos can provide substantial benefits to both society and the animal kingdom. The challenge lies in ensuring that these institutions adhere to the principles of conservation while prioritizing animal welfare.