I largely disagree with the view that schools should focus only on academic success and examinations and leave practical skills to families.
It is true that academic subjects such as mathematics, science and languages are essential. They help students develop critical thinking, prepare for higher education, and improve future career prospects. Schools are also structured around examinations, which provide a standardized way to assess knowledge and maintain educational quality. From this perspective, prioritizing academic achievement is understandable.
However, excluding practical skills such as cookery, dressmaking and woodworking from the school curriculum would be a mistake. Not all students grow up in families where these skills are taught, either due to lack of time, knowledge, or resources. Schools play an important role in providing equal opportunities, and practical subjects ensure that every child gains basic life skills regardless of background. For example, learning cookery can promote healthy eating habits, while woodworking can improve problem-solving, creativity and manual dexterity.
Moreover, practical subjects are not merely hobbies; they can be academically valuable and career-oriented. Many students learn best through hands-on activities, and vocational skills may lead directly to employment or further training. In an increasingly diverse job market, practical competence is just as important as theoretical knowledge. Teaching these skills at school also helps students discover talents and interests that traditional academic subjects may not reveal.
In conclusion, while academic success is crucial, schools should not limit education to examination subjects alone. A balanced curriculum that includes both academic and practical skills better prepares students for real life and promotes a more inclusive and effective education system