It is suggested that when given the choice of whether to work most of the time or not to work at all, people would always opt for the latter. Despite acknowledging the rationale why some would do so, I would firmly disagree with this suggestion since there are still people who enjoy working and try to seek a work-life balance.
Proponents of a life without work often highlight the potential for an improved quality of life. They would argue that employment can be a source of significant stress, leading to various physical and mental health issues, which is why some would quit to improve their health. Some would also say that instead of dedicating a substantial portion of their lives to their jobs, people could invest that time in nurturing family relationships and exploring new experiences, thereby forging lasting memories with loved ones. They usually cite the examples of affluent individuals who have left high-powered corporate roles to focus on self-care, family, or travel to dream destinations.
Nevertheless, it is important to recognize that this perspective does not resonate with everyone. In fact, there are people who would still choose to engage in working since this gives them a purpose. For these individuals, professional achievements not only bring them a sense of accomplishment but also create values for themselves and their society, all of which are important and meaningful for one to continue with their jobs. Rather than opting for a life entirely devoid of work, they strive to establish a balance between their professional responsibilities and personal pursuits, thereby enabling them to lead fulfilling lives.
In conclusion, it is understandable why some would make the choice of not working at all in their entire life. However, I would take the view that this does not universally apply and that several people would still choose to work and aim to strike a balance that allows them to enjoy both their careers and their personal lives.